Tuesday, June 26, 2012

14 ára gomul genta fær deyðshóttanir fyri at kritiseraða samkynt hjúnaband


Tað vísir seg at fleiri kristin, enntá ein 14 ára gomul genta, hevur fingi fleiri deyðshóttanir og ágangandi viðmerkingar, tí hon hevur ditta sær at sagt sína persónligu meining um samkynt hjúnaband. Nakrar av viðmerkingunum ljóða:
“I hate people like this. Most (not all) Americans are [expletive] retards. If I ever see this girl, I will kill her. That’s a promise.”
Other documented responses included: “I’m gonna kill ‘er!”
“Her parents should be exterminated.”
“The [sic] is why abortion must stay legal—to prevent little bigots like this from being Born…”
“Kill this child and his [sic] parent, for my 11 birthday would be a wonderful gift, thanks.”
“Parents like hers should be sterilized…”

Ein onnur ung 16 ára gomul genta, Madeleine McAulay (havi ikki varhuga av at hetta er sama genta), hevur somuleiðis verið fyri ágangi. Hon skrivar: 
So let me just get this straight.  If I‘m young and I give into the left’s agenda, I’m praised, but I‘m young and I’m conservative, I’m evil?  Hm. Now I want to be clear.  I don’t hate gay people, so stop trying to say that I do.  I simply believe that traditional marriage is the most productive way, and the Biblical way, to pursue a relationship…
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/16-year-old-conservative-girl-receives-death-threats-after-posting-gay-marriage-youtube-video/


Eitt annað offur fyri slíkum ágangi er bretski politikkarin David Burrowes:

"In Britain a Conservative MP has revealed that he had received a death threat because of his support for the traditional definition of marriage.
David Burrowes MP made the revelation at the launch of Coalition for Marriage, a new grassroots campaign group dedicated to preserving the traditional definition of marriage, last week.
He said: “I myself have been subjected to hate mail, to accusations of homophobia, and to a death threat as well, which is just extraordinary when one is affirming what the law is as it stands and has done historically for hundreds, if not thousands, of years.”
http://www.christian.org.uk/news/girl-14-gets-death-threats-for-defending-marriage/ 


Helt annars vit vóru opinsinnað fyri at tann einstakið, kundi hava sína áskoðan og enntá hesin kundi úttala seg um hesa áskoðan, óansæð hvussu negativt hetta verður tikið upp. 
Eg meini so við, nú hevur nýmótans gudloysa rákið, enntá lagt upp til kjak, framtíðar møguleikan, um at kunna avlíva nýðføðingar. Harvið kunnu børn sum hava eitt brek verða burturbeind eftir barnsburð! Geldur hetta eisini, um staðfest kundi verði, at barnið var samkynt ella okkurt annað? Neyvan og tað hevði somuleiðis verið skeivt!
Eg eri tí ikki so sannførdur um at hetta rákið sum nú er vaksandi, er so móttakiligt og opið, sum okkum verður billa inn. Heldur ikki tá talan er um tess hugburð til tey sum hava ein øðrvísi áskoðan.

Heldur vildi eg sagt at hetta nútíðar rákið, sum annars pástendur seg framstanda sum ein forkempara fyri frælsi og opinleika, møguliga ber uppá duldar hugsjónir og hugburðir.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Tað er einum og hvørjum frítt at viðmerkja og kritisera, men bannan, persónlig álop, og niðring kunnu verða strika.

Verður ákæra reist um óerligheit ella lygn, eigur viðmerkjarin ikki at verða duldur.

Trøll og persónar sum bevíst royna at eitra kjakið fáa ikki longur loyvi at luttaka.