Monday, July 11, 2011

Europa Ráði verja Menningarlæruna

Helt ikki tað var neyðugt, at gera so mikið burturúr at verja nakað sum annars er so væl grundgivi og prógva, men Europa tingið hevur viðtiki at verja menningarlæruna; teir meta at kritikkur av menningarlæruni er brot á mannarættindini, at hetta setir samfelag okkara í vanda og avmarkar okkara framgongd innan granksing av heiligváði:

http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc07/EDOC11297.htm

Grundgevingar fyri avgerðini sum leiðandi røddir í Europa hava tikið, kunnu lesast í hesum skjalinum:


SummaryThe theory of evolution is being attacked by religious fundamentalists who call for creationist theories to be taught in European schools alongside or even in place of it. From a scientific view point there is absolutely no doubt that evolution is a central theory for our understanding of the Universe and of life on Earth.
Creationism in any of its forms, such as “intelligent design”, is not based on facts, does not use any scientific reasoning and its contents are pathetically inadequate for science classes.
The Assembly calls on education authorities in member States to promote scientific knowledge and the teaching of evolution and to oppose firmly any attempts at teaching creationism as a scientific discipline.
A.       Draft resolution1.       The Parliamentary Assembly is worried about the possible ill-effects of the spread of creationist theories within our education systems and about the consequences for our democracies. If we are not careful, creationism could become a threat to human rights, which are a key concern of the Council of Europe.
2.       Creationism, born of the denial of the evolution of species through natural selection, was for a long time an almost exclusively American phenomenon. Today creationist theories are tending to find their way into Europe and their spread is affecting quite a few Council of Europe member states.
3.       The prime target of present-day creationists, most of whom are Christian or Muslim, is education. Creationists are bent on ensuring that their theories are included in the school science syllabus. Creationism cannot, however, lay claim to being a scientific discipline.
4.       Creationists question the scientific character of certain items of knowledge and argue that the theory of evolution is only one interpretation among others. They accuse scientists of not providing enough evidence to establish the theory of evolution as scientifically valid. On the contrary, they defend their own statements as scientific. None of this stands up to objective analysis.
5.       We are witnessing a growth of modes of thought which, the better to impose religious dogma, are attacking the very core of the knowledge that we have patiently built up on nature, evolution, our origins and our place in the universe.
6.       There is a real risk of a serious confusion being introduced into our children’s minds between what has to do with convictions, beliefs and ideals and what has to do with science, and of the advent of an “all things are equal” attitude, which may seem appealing and tolerant but is actually disastrous.
7.       Creationism has many contradictory aspects. The “intelligent design” theory, which is the latest, more refined version of creationism, does not deny a certain degree of evolution but claims that this is the work of a superior intelligence and not natural selection. Though more subtle in its presentation, the doctrine of intelligent design is no less dangerous.
8.       The Assembly has constantly insisted that science is of fundamental importance. Science has made possible considerable improvements in living and working conditions and is a not insignificant factor in economic, technological and social development. The theory of evolution has nothing to do with divine revelation but is built on facts.
9.       Creationism claims to be based on scientific rigour. In actual fact the methods employed by creationists are of three types: purely dogmatic assertions; distorted use of scientific quotations, sometimes illustrated with magnificent photographs; and backing from well-known scientists, most of whom are not biologists. By these means creationists seek to appeal to non-specialists and sow doubt and confusion in their minds.
10.       Evolution is not simply a matter of the evolution of humans and of populations. Denying it could have serious consequences for the development of our societies. Advances in medical research with the aim of effectively combating infectious diseases such as AIDS are impossible if every principle of evolution is denied. One cannot be fully aware of the risks involved in the significant decline in biodiversity and climate change if the mechanisms of evolution are not understood.
11.       Our modern world is based on a long history, of which the development of science and technology forms an important part. However, the scientific approach is still not well understood and this is liable to encourage the development of all manner of fundamentalism and extremism, synonymous with attacks of utmost virulence on human rights. The total rejection of science is definitely one of the most serious threats to human rights and civic rights.
12.       The war on the theory of evolution and on its proponents most often originates in forms of religious extremism which are closely allied to extreme right-wing political movements. The creationist movements possess real political power. The fact of the matter, and this has been exposed on several occasions, is that the advocates of strict creationism are out to replace democracy by theocracy.
13.       All leading representatives of the main monotheistic religions have adopted a much more moderate attitude. Pope Benedict XVI, for example, as his predecessor Pope John-Paul II, today praises the role of the sciences in the evolution of humanity and recognises that the theory of evolution is “more than a hypothesis”.
14.       The teaching of all phenomena concerning evolution as a fundamental scientific theory is therefore crucial to the future of our societies and our democracies. For that reason it must occupy a central position in the curriculum, and especially in the science syllabus. Evolution is present everywhere, from medical overprescription of antibiotics that encourages the emergence of resistant bacteria to agricultural overuse of pesticides that causes insect mutations on which pesticides no longer have any effect.
15.       The Council of Europe has highlighted the importance of teaching about culture and religion. In the name of freedom of expression and individual belief, creationist theories, as any other theological position, could possibly be presented as an addition to cultural and religious education, but they cannot claim scientific respectability.
16.       Science provides irreplaceable training in intellectual rigour. It seeks not to explain “why things are” but to understand how they work.
17.       Investigation of the creationists’ growing influence shows that the arguments between creationism and evolution go well beyond intellectual debate. If we are not careful, the values that are the very essence of the Council of Europe will be under direct threat from creationist fundamentalists. It is part of the role of the Council’s parliamentarians to react before it is too late.
18.       The Parliamentary Assembly therefore urges the member states, and especially their education authorities, to:
18.1.       defend and promote scientific knowledge;
18.2.       strengthen the teaching of the foundations of science, its history, its epistemology and its methods alongside the teaching of objective scientific knowledge;
18.3.       make science more comprehensible, more attractive and closer to the realities of the contemporary world;
18.4.       firmly oppose the teaching of creationism as a scientific discipline on an equal footing with the theory of evolution by natural selection and in general resist presentation of creationist theories in any discipline other than religion;
18.5.       promote the teaching of evolution by natural selection as a fundamental scientific theory in the school curriculum.
19.       The Assembly welcomes the fact that, in June 2006, 27 Academies of Science of Council of Europe member states signed a declaration on the teaching of evolution and calls on academies of science that have not yet done so to sign the declaration.
Hmm...eitt ella annað sigur okkum at menningarlæran og rákið sum umboðar eina materialistiska heimsmynd í løtuni merkir hitan. Vesturlendingar í hópatalið eru nógva staðni so smátt við at venda sær aftur til tann andaliga heimin. Vøksturin av Islam skapir eisini rembingar í okkara samfelagi.

Men her er so nógv at tríva í, at ein veit ikki, hvar ein skal byrja. Eitt er at hetta framstandi tingið framleggur propaganda, tildømis at kristin sum trúgva á Gud, ikki leggja stórvegis í gransking, vísind, heiligváð og annað--hetta er rein lygn. Hópin av vísindaligu gjøgnumbrotini í nýggjari tíð kunnu tíðarfestast áðrenn menningarlæruna hjá Darwin, har í gudsóttandi persónar vóru á odda fyri vísindaligu tilgongdini. 

Eitt annað er, at hesir framleggja skapanarvísind sum brot á mannarættindir (oh yeah) og at skapanarvísind førir samfelag okkara frá einum demokratiskum støði inní teokrati. Haldi at flestu trúgvandi ídag ynskja øðrvísi. Haldi at flestu kristin er nøgd við at teirra kristna trúgv skal hava somu rættindir og sømdir, sum eitt nú tann nátturulistiska-materialistiska heimsmyndin. Hesi eru hóast alt væl minnið fundamentalistisk enn Jón Joensen, sum vil hava kristindóm útruddaðan (veit ikki heilt hvat hann hevur í huga her) og Eivind Ortind Simonsen, sum fegin vil bólka tey kristnu sum tey samfelagsligu 'minni mentu' og 'líti vitandi'. Harafturímóti haldi eg ikki, at kristin hava áhuga í at fremja útruddingar av onkrum slag, ella slíkar bólkingar av hvør grunda á heimsmynd teirra, er minni mentur og ikki. Heldur ikki leggja hesi stórt í at stýra samfelagnum. Heldur ikki meti eg Kristindómin at hava rættin at stýra, um ikki samfelagi sjálvt ynskir tað (hetta er meiri enn ein kann siga sum hesar sekuleru røddirnar). Jesus sjálvur, legði dent á munin millum statin og Gudin. 

Kristin ynskja tó heldur ikki at sekuleru kreftirnar, sum eru eitt ateistiskt makt-tól, skulu sleppa at avkristna almenna rúmi, avtaka talufrælsi og frælsi til fríða gransking og niðurstøðu.     

Tak sum dømi hesi punktini niðanfyri:
91. With creationism today, we are witnessing a growth of modes of thought which, the better to impose religious dogma, are attacking the very core of the knowledge that we have built up little by little concerning nature, evolution, our origins and our place in the universe. There can be no doubt that this is a serious attack on human rights.
Hvussu í allari víðu verð kann skapanarvísind verða eitt álop á mannarættindir? 
92. There is a great risk of a serious confusion being introduced into our children’s minds between what has to do with convictions, beliefs and ideals and what has to do with science, and of the advent of an “all things are equal” attitude, which may seem appealing and tolerant but is actually extremely harmful.
Her hava vit tað so aftur. Sum eg havi lagt dent á fleiri ferðir á hesum blogginum, hesar gudleysu kreftirnar eru bevíst eftir okkara kristnu børnum, og her hava vit tað enntá frá Europa Tinginum.
104. A detailed study of the growing influence of the creationists shows that the discussions between creationism and evolutionism go well beyond intellectual disputes. If we are not careful, the values that are the very essence of the Council of Europe will be in danger of being directly threatened by the creationist fundamentalists. It is part of the role of the Council’s parliamentarians to react before it is too late.
Hesir vilja tí ikki kjakast, nei, í hesum høpinum er í veruleikanum slett ikki nakað pláss fyri tí akademiska; nei her skal ein mátmikil reaktión til, áðrenn tað verður ov seint. 


Eg spyrji hvat slag at reaktión? Í hesum høpinum kann hon bara verða lógvargevandi og politisk.

Býtt eisini merki í orðalagi hjá hesum politiska tingið:

The Parliamentary Assembly therefore urges the member states, and especially their education authorities, to...

Stríði móti skapanarvísind og ID, er tí ikki bara ein spurningur í samband við akademiska vongin í einum vesturlendskum samfelagi, men líka nógv ein spurningur sum skal avgerðast at statinum sjálvum.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Skal koma meiri inn á hetta seinni men Jón Joensen hevur akkurát viðmerkt henda postin á Gudloysi heimasíðuni. Hann staðfestir at Europa Tingið og hann sjálvur samtykja at staturin skal taka hond um eitt hvørt sum gevur gudloysi og materialistisku heimsmyndini fyrimun. Við øðrum orðum, mín kritikkur til Jón og gudloysi rákið, á hesum blogginum, var ikki so yvirdrivi sum nøkur vildu hava tað at verða.